| Proposal
- Long term antibiotic treatment.
BACKGROUND. Oral and intravenous antibiotics have
been effective in chronic Lyme disease but are associated
with a high persistent and recurrent rate. Symptomatic treatment
regimes have often been ineffective. Intramuscular benzathine
penicillin has been reported effective in persistent and
recurrent presentations.
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study is
to test the hypothesis that extending the duration of intramuscular
benzathine penicillin to 12 months will reduce the incidence
of persistent, recurrent, and refractory Lyme disease.
DESIGN: This is a Phase III, randomized, single-center,
open-label study of the efficacy of 6 versus 12 months of
intramuscular benzathine penicillin in the treatment of
patients with persistent, recurrent, and refractory Lyme
disease.
SETTING: The participants will be patients with persistent,
recurrent, and refractory Lyme disease consecutively evaluated
at a primary care setting situated in Westchester County,
the most hyperendemic county for Lyme disease in the United
States.
PATIENTS: Sixty patients will be enrolled
INTERVENTIONS: Patients will receive intramuscular
penicillin (1.2 or 2.4 million units) given weekly for at
least 6 months. The decision to increase intramuscular benzathine
penicillin to 2.4 million units will be used at the discretion
of the individual investigator. All patients will receive
concomitant acidophilus.
MEASUREMENTS: The trial will 1) determine the response
rate of extending intravenous benzathine penicillin, 2)
determine the efficacy of intravenous benzathine penicillin
in reducing the incidence of recurrent Lyme disease, 3)
and determine the incidence and
CONCLUSIONS: This study examines the hypothesis that
prolonging antibiotics is effective. This protocol addresses
the duration effect of intramuscular benzathine penicillin
through the use of a standardized, validated, and widely
accepted Phase III duration response approach. The design
of this study will also provide guidance for other studies
on the role of prolonged antibiotic use.
Aim and specific objectives: The primary objective
of this study is to test the hypothesis that extending the
duration of intramuscular benzathine penicillin to 12 months
will reduce the incidence of persistent, recurrent, and
refractory Lyme disease. The trial will 1) determine the
response rate of extending intravenous benzathine penicillin,
2) determine the efficacy of intravenous benzathine penicillin
in reducing the incidence of recurrent Lyme disease, 3)
and determine the incidence and profiles of adverse events
of extending intramuscular benzathine penicillin
Background and Significance: Persistent and recurrent
Lyme disease, a frustrating complication of both early and
late Lyme disease, occurs in 34-62% of patients with known
Lyme disease.1,2 A recently completed clinical trial proposed
symptomatic based on the failure of 4 weeks of antibiotics.3
However, the prognosis for patients treated symptomatically
was equally as poor.4 Dinerman et al. reported a 2 1/2 year
success rate of 20 % (1 of 15 patients) for 15 patients
who relapsed after 4 weeks of antibiotics.4 Neither fibromyalgia,
chronic fatigue, or psychiatric models have fulfilled the
expectations in the treatment of chronic Lyme disease.
Therefore, an alternative schedule would be advantageous
in this population of previously treated patients. Prolonged
treatment and retreatment with antibiotics have achieved
meaningful response rates without significant adverse events,
and has allowed the possibility of overcoming chronic Lyme
disease.5-16 Intravenous antibiotics have been effectively
used for in the treatment of patients with persistent and
recurrent Lyme disease but are associated with relatively
high costs and treatment-related adverse events. Furthermore,
the efficacy of prolonged intravenous antibiotic use to
the patients with persistent and recurrent Lyme disease
compared with other treatment is still being examined.
During the past two decades, use of intramuscular benzathine
penicillin has gained increasing acceptance. The genesis
of the intramuscular benzathine penicillin was based on
a single randomized clinical trial in which patients with
Lyme arthritis receiving 4 weeks of intramuscular benzathine
penicillin or placebo demonstrated a 30% success versus
0% for placebo.5 Despite the benefits of Intramuscular benzathine,
its use was overshadowed by reported successes of oral and
intravenous antibiotics.
In the 1990s, there was renewed interest in its potential
antibiotic activity based on initial results in the treatment
of Lyme disease failing oral and intravenous antibiotics.
Cimmino et al. reported use of weekly benzathine penicillin
for prolonged periods in 2 patients failing oral and intravenous
antibiotics.17 The investigators treated 2 patients with
weekly benzathine penicillin at 1.2 million units 2-6 months.17
The authors concluded that weekly intramuscular benzathine
penicillin compared favorably with other therapeutic interventions
in chronic Lyme disease.
Intramuscular benzathine penicillin is an attractive agent
for use in persistent and recurrent Lyme disease for several
reasons. First, penicillin has been effective against Lyme
disease in culture.18 Second, intramuscular benzathine penicillin
is easier to administer and compliance has been demonstrated.19
Finally, intramuscular benzathine penicillin has a range
of biologic properties, including sustained tissue levels
and is bactericidal activity, all of which presumably contribute
to its success.20-22 The prolonged lower tissue levels of
intramuscular benzathine penicillin facilitates the killing
of the slowing dividing spirochete, an approach completely
different from that of short-lived higher tissue levels
of intravenous antibiotics.22
Several subsequent case series involved patients with chronic
Lyme disease; the reported response rates from these trials
were 25-96%.23,24 In a pilot study of children, intramuscular
benzathine penicillin 96% effectiveness was similar to those
of oral and intravenous antibiotic regimens.23
Recently, Fallon et al. reported similar results in terms
of success.10 Fallon et al. from Columbia treated 18 patients
with recurrent or persistent Lyme disease with intravenous
and/or intramuscular penicillin. Patients retreated scored
better than untreated patients on overall and individual
measures of cognition. The effectiveness of retreatment
was demonstrated even for patients previously treated with
an average of 96 weeks of intramuscular benzathine penicillin.
Battaglia et al. conducted a study similar to ours with
regard to use of intramuscular penicillin after failing
intravenous antibiotics.24 Intramuscular benzathine penicillin
was administered weekly for 6 months to patients previously
treated with oral and intravenous antibiotics and reported
a 25% response rate. The clinical response to 6 months of
intramuscular benzathine penicillin were encouraging and
indicated that further evaluation of this approach is warranted.
Taken together, these studies, albeit small, indicate efficacy
of weekly intramuscular benzathine penicillin comparable
to that seen in prior studies, suggests that intramuscular
benzathine penicillin may be another agent to consider in
the treatment of patients with Lyme disease. In addition,
intramuscular benzathine penicillin administered weekly
for 6 months to patients with chronic Lyme disease is well
tolerated. The optimal dosage and schedule of intramuscular
benzathine penicillin to treat chronic Lyme disease has
not yet been determined. Both a duration finding study and
a study on the prospective use of intramuscular benzathine
penicillin for chronic Lyme disease needs to performed to
better understand the value of intramuscular benzathine
penicillin in treating chronic Lyme disease.
Duration hypothesis The observation of the higher
success rates with prolonging the use of intramuscular benzathine
penicillin led to the hypothesis that success would be determined
by the duration of treatment. The development of an innovative
therapy that can be given on an outpatient basis with only
moderate side effects is needed. In designing the current
trial, we chose the minimum of 6 month regimen as described
17,23,24 and studied in our surveillance data base as the
control group of this Phase II trial.25 Because the duration
of antibiotic treatment is apparently important in patients
resolving a persistent infection, we introduced a prolonged
schedule of one year of intramuscular benzathine penicillin
schedule or as long as progression or severe side effects
are not encountered. To determine the net effects of duration
of treatment on success rates and relapse, we compared the
outcome of 6 months with one year of intramuscular benzathine
penicillin. Our primary objective will be to find the effects
and side effects of intramuscular benzathine penicillin
for persistent, recurrent, and refractory Lyme disease.
Bibliography
1. Asch ES, Bujak DI, Weiss M, Peterson MGE, Weinstein A.
Lyme disease: An infectious and postinfectious syndrome.
J Rheumatol 1994;21:454-456.
2. Shadick NA, Phillips CB, Logigian EL, Steere AC, Kaplan
RF, Berardi VP, Duray PH, Larson MG, Wright EA, Ginsburg
KS, et al. The long-term clinical outcomes of Lyme disease.
A population-based retrospective cohort study. Ann Intern
Med 1994 Oct 15;121(8):560-7.
3. Klempner MS, Hu LT, Evans J, Schmid CH, Johnson GM, Trevino
RP, Norton D, Levy L, Wall D, McCall J, Kosinski M, Weinstein
A. Two controlled trials of antibiotic treatment in patients
with persistent symptoms and a history of Lyme disease.
N Engl J Med. 2001 Jul 12;345(2):85-92.
4. Dinerman H, Steere AC. Lyme disease associated with fibromyalgia.
Ann Intern Med. 1992 Aug 15;117(4):281-5.
5. Steere AC, Green J, Schoen RT, Taylor E, Hutchinson GJ,
Rahn DW, Malawista SE. Successful parenteral penicillin
therapy of established Lyme arthritis. N Engl J Med 1985
Apr 4;312(14):869-74.
6. Logigian EL, Kaplan RF, Steere AC. Chronic neurologic
manifestations of Lyme disease. N Engl J Med 1990; 323:1438
44.
7. Logigian EL, Kaplan RF, Steere AC. Successful treatment
of Lyme encephalopathy with intravenous ceftriaxone. J Infect
Dis 1999 Aug;180(2):377-83.
8. Wahlberg P, Granlund H, Nyman D, Panelius J, Seppala
I. Treatment of late Lyme borreliosis. J Infect 1994 Nov;29(3):255-61.
9. Donta ST. Tetracycline therapy for chronic Lyme disease.
Clin Infect Dis 1997 Jul;25 Suppl 1:S52-6.
10. Fallon BA, Tager F, Keilp J, Weiss N, Liebowitz MR,
Fein L, Liegner K. Repeated Antibiotic Treatment in Chronic
Lyme Disease. Journal of Spirochetal and Tick-Borne Diseases
1999;6(4):94-102.
11. Cameron DJ. 21st Century Lyme disease [presentation].
14th International Scientific Conference on Lyme Disease
& Other Tick-Borne Disorders. Farmington, Ct. April
2001; Treatment of Lyme disease. Conn Med 1989 Jun;53(6):335-7.
12. Lawrence C, Lipton RB, Lowy FD, Coyle PK. Seronegative
chronic relapsing neuroborreliosis. Eur Neurol 1995;35(2):113-7.
13. Ziska MH, Donta ST, Demarest FC. Physician preferences
in the diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease in the United
States. Infection 1996 Mar-Apr;24(2):182-6.
14. Reid MC, Schoen RT, Evans J, Rosenberg JC, Horwitz RI.
The consequences of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of Lyme
disease: an observational study. Ann Intern Med. 1998 Mar
1;128(5):354-62.
15. Battaglia HR, Alvarez G, Mercau A, Fay M, Campodónico
M. Psychiatric Symptomatology Associated with Presumptive
Lyme Disease: Clinical Evidence. Journal of Spirochetal
and Tick-Borne Diseases 7(1):22-25.
16. Fallon BA. Chronic Lyme Disease Research Study. A double-blind
placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial evaluating
the efficacy of 10 weeks intravenous ceftriaxone and effects
on brain imaging. Enrollment since 2000.
17. Cimmino MA, Accardo S. Long term treatment of chronic
Lyme arthritis with benzathine penicillin. Ann Rheum Dis.
1992 Aug;51(8):1007-8.
18. Baradaran-Dilmaghani R, Stanek G. In vitro susceptibility
of thirty Borrelia strains from various sources against
eight antimicrobial chemotherapeutics. Infection 1996 Jan-Feb;24(1):60-3.
19. Crowe G, Theodore C, Forster GE, Goh BT. Acceptability
and compliance with daily injections of procaine penicillin
in the outpatient treatment of syphilis-treponemal infection.
Sex Transm Dis 1997 Mar;24(3):127-30.
20. Mohr JA, Griffiths W, Jackson R, Saadah H, Bird P, Riddle
J. Neurosyphilis and penicillin levels in cerebrospinal
fluid. JAMA 1976 Nov 8;236(19):2208-9.
21. Rein MF. Biopharmacology of syphilotherapy. J Am Vener
Dis Assoc 1976 Dec;3(2 Pt 2):109-27.
22. Luft BJ, Volkman DJ, Halperin JJ, Dattwyler RJ. New
chemotherapeutic approaches in the treatment of Lyme borreliosis.
Ann N Y Acad Sci 1988;539:352-61.539:352-61.
23. Corsaro L Intramuscular Bicillin For Persistent Pediatric
Lyme Disease. IX International Conference on Lyme Borreliosis
& Other Tick-borne Disorders, 1999.
24. Héctor R. Battaglia, MD; Guido Alvarez, MD; Augusto
Mercau, MD; Marcelo Fay, MD; Martín Campodónico
Psychiatric Symptomatology Associated with Presumptive Lyme
Disease: Clinical Evidence. Journal of Spirochetal and Tick-Borne
Diseases 7(1):22-25 2000.
25. Cameron DJ. Lyme Disease Surveillance Database. Consecutive
case series since 1997.
|